Green Smart_HealthThe gadget spec URL could not be found
======================================================================================
|
posted Mar 24, 2012, 4:01 AM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
[
updated Mar 24, 2012, 4:06 AM
]
Just the other day the children and I had just finished
reading / studying the book “The Native American Experience” by Jay Wertz. We
read this book as part of home school American history studies.
Now I grew up when westerns were still very popular, John
Wayne was always helping the U.S. Calvary fight the wild Indians and it was
common to play cowboys and Indians with everyone wanting to be the cowboys
because they were the “good guys”! This very well documented book looks at the
colonization to modern day (or occupation) of the Americas from the standpoint
of the Native Americans. A viewpoint that I must admit I never looked at before
and I know was never taught when I was in school. To make a long story short
many of the American Natives welcomed and helped the colonialist ((aka: 1st
Thanksgiving. . .) but slowly the tide turned. The natives for the most part
were an integral part of the whole territory, not really staking out parcels to
call their personal property. It seemed they exhibited a greater appreciation
for the earth and were deeply spiritual, although they believed in the Great
Spirit versus God or Christ.
This lifestyle of being closer to the earth with freedom to
roam caused problems for the more possessive colonials that wanted to own land,
build permanent towns, roads. . . Now, how can you get land from people that don’t
“actually“ own it? – typically you trade something for it, or make a promise /
treaty for it (then break it when “more” was wanted) or fight / kill and take
it. After all, these natives are so ignorant, then don’t know how to use the
land, create governing bodies and they don’t even believe in God.
As the natives lost more and more, there was seen the need
to assimilate these people into the civilized ways of life, teach them to read,
write English, learn to farm / ranch / build and to accept God / Jesus as their
religious leader.
Over time, most assimilated and adapted completely, some
adapted while still holding on to some of their traditions and beliefs, some assimilated
so successfully to the point of learning way s to help their people economically
prosper via casinos . . . which some traditional tribal councils still do not
fully approve of. These natives have adapted and now have truly become one of “us”
but after all this history / retrospective what have we learned. Were the colonialist
“right” or should the assimilation and adaptation gone in the opposite
direction? The direction that the naturalists, tree huggers, green movement . .
. are trying to lead people back to. . . as children of the earth? We know and
have to admit that the “civilized people of the world” have radically changed
the earth more than any other creatures ever in existence and maybe not, in all
cases, for the better.
Next, as I reflected on this overall history lessons learned,
I looked at the way our bodies work coping with life, viruses and diseases. The
mind / body / spirit typically start out as one in-balance entity then over
time one part or more create self-centered drifts. The spirit seeks enjoyment,
power, money and therefore the mind craves sweets / questionable foods as a reward
or as a way to cope with the stress associated to spirit’s quest and the body
assimilates / adapts accordingly. When a virus or disease enters the body there
is an initial resistance but slowly the aggressor (“colonial” aggressor in the
case of cancer) selfishly imparts itself on the natives to accept, assimilate
and adapt till the natives are defeated (dead!) or the aggressor is reluctantly
over-taken.
I know many may not see this analogy correct, useful or even
interesting and that’s the way life is – full of diverse opinions and
influences, from the smallest organisms to the largest civilizations /
continents. I guess my biggest point is maybe, just maybe, sometimes the paths
that are taken in life are not the fairest, wisest or most beneficial in the
long run and maybe there is a way we can and should learn from history / life
and not just learn about it. Just learning about history – well - there’s no
future in it! =========================================================================== Assimilation and Adaptation - http://goo.gl/8jK5k |
posted Feb 12, 2012, 10:18 PM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
[
updated Feb 12, 2012, 10:23 PM
]
While on a nice extended family vacation that ended just a couple days ago, my thoughts wandered to what would be a good topic for the next blog. It is amazing the answer our creator provides! Not only offering a topic but providing the content that is just too good (and truthful) not to pass along. There was even the request to pass this obituary on! Found this while waiting for our lunch order at a restaurant one day and looking at the "Mountain Lakefront & Rural Property Guide (Charleston, TN)" to pass some time. Here is the reprint, in it's entirety:
-----------
"Today we mourn the
passing of a beloved old friend, Common Sense, who has been with us
for many years. No one knows for sure how old he was, since his birth records were long ago lost in bureaucratic
red tape.He will be remembered as having cultivated such
valuable lessons as:
- Knowing when to come in out of the rain;
- Why the early bird gets the worm;
- Life isn't always fair;
- and maybe it was my fault.
Common Sense lived by simple, sound financial
policies (don't spend more than you can earn) and reliable strategies
(adults, not children, are in charge).
His health began to deteriorate rapidly when
well-intentioned but overbearing regulations were set in place. Reports
of a 6-year-old boy charged with sexual harassment for kissing a
classmate; teens suspended from school for using mouthwash after
lunch; and a teacher fired for reprimanding an unruly student, only
worsened his condition.
Common Sense lost ground when parents attacked
teachers for doing the job that they themselves had failed to do in
disciplining their unruly children.
It declined even further when schools were required
to get parental consent to administer sun lotion or an aspirin to a
student; but could not inform parents when a student became pregnant and wanted to have an abortion.
Common Sense lost the will to live as the churches
became businesses; and criminals received better treatment than their
victims.
Common Sense took a beating when you couldn't
defend yourself from a burglar in your own home and the burglar could sue
you for assault.
Common Sense finally gave up the will to live,
after a woman failed to realize that a steaming cup of coffee was hot. She
spilled a little in her lap, and was promptly awarded a huge
settlement.
Common Sense was preceded in death, by his parents,
Truth and Trust, by his wife, Discretion, by his daughter,
Responsibility, and by his son, Reason.
He is survived by his 4 stepbrothers;
I Know My Rights
I Want It Now
Someone Else Is To Blame
I'm A Victim
Not many attended his funeral because so few
realized he was gone. If you still remember him, pass this on. If not, join the majority and do nothing.
Author Lori Bergman First published in the Indianapolis Star 3-15-98" =============================== OBITUARY - COMMON SENSE has passed away! - http://goo.gl/Sm0zW |
posted Dec 20, 2011, 3:52 AM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
[
updated Dec 20, 2011, 4:03 AM
]
In this blog I am going to definitively answer the
philosophical question of is there an after-life or life after death! - Just kidding!
As an emotional tough 2011 for me, my family and close
personal friends comes to a close I hope to make this 3rd blog
pertaining to my observations of health ó death my last, at least for a while.
In the 1st blog ( Funeral Arrangements – A Health Changing
Experience! - http://goo.gl/WJHx8
) it reveals a lot of hidden details and costs that surround a loved one dying,
the arrangements, under much sorrow / stress, that need to be followed up on and
some suggestions on what can be done while alive to help make that time of
passing less painful for the one’s left behind.
The 2nd blog (A Fine Line Between Quality of Life (Lifestyle
Standard) and Quality of Health?! - http://goo.gl/vKTRX ) concerns loving family /
caregiver decisions / persuasions to keep their loved one healthy and happy as
possible, ultimately who makes the final decisions and, in reality, where
should this health concern / training actually start.
NOW, on to "is there life after death" but NOT as it concerns the person
who has passed away but as to those close loved ones that are left still here, alive
above ground, on earth. It has been interesting to see the full gamut that this
life after death takes, ranging from “very quickly moving on / starting new and
fresh” to “feeling guilty – responsible for what happened” to “kinda sitting
around waiting for their time to go” and all points in-between.
It all starts after the funeral reception is over and everyone has to
return to their regular routines, of course these are changed for those that
are very immediate family to the deceased. When everyone goes home and it’s the
one, two or few that are left! Toughest will usually be on the “one home alone”.
Initially they can stay active taking care of the gifts, distributing /
watering the flowers and arrangements, paying the related expenses, writing the
thank you notes, going through / dealing with the personal affects. . . There
will be personal times of memories and sadness / tears and this is a normal
part of life but the holidays / regular family get-togethers can be pretty rough
as well.
It’s how one proceeds from here, the choice they make that determines if
there will be life after death. I have seen in one instance the “thank you”
cards for attending and/or “giving in memory” were sent out the day after the
funeral and the personal effects sold / donated within the month (not cruel but
these things needed to be done and this person is just not a procrastinator).
Then adjusting to, in this case, single life again. Started fixing some things
around the house, chores like grocery shopping, watching TV, all which were
normal activities before as well. Suggestions for activities outside the norm were
made, like joining senior groups or volunteering but that has not been accepted
yet.
In another case, one of my cousins died last year from cancer and her
husband sent us a picture collage Christmas card that tells of his upcoming
retirement in April, shows pictures of his pilot training / flying, his “new”
co-pilot and describes his plans to go spelunking (I have to look up what that
is) in Carlsbad Caverns, hiking to the bottom of the Grand Canyon. . .! In an
odd way is hard to see someone move on after a loss of “my blood” family member
but actually I am very happy for him. It’s life / it’s learning to live again /
it’s life after death.
All life after death experiences are different as the individuals
involved are and that not bad nor good, it’s again the way life is so richly meant to be –
the good with the bad - sad versus the happy. . . The greatest concern I really have is
seeing some grieving individuals slip into a state of depression and, if there
is to be a lesson in this blog, it’s praying / reminding the caring friends / loving family
members to be there to support / believe in this person / these people through this very
important time of transition.
There can be life after death and sometimes being there, even if it’s
inconvenient sometimes, can make all the difference in both or all your lives.
I wish everyone the happiest holiday possible and prosperous happy new
year.
======================================================== Is there Life After Death? - http://goo.gl/owfIi
|
posted Nov 5, 2011, 5:46 AM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
[
updated Nov 5, 2011, 4:30 PM
]
This
past year my family and I have been having a rougher one than the last few.
Mother-in-law passed away, another close friend of my wife’s, her husband had
also passed, my wife’s cousin’s spouse’s mother passed, my lifelong friend had
a heart attack / quadruple bypass and the rest of life’s unending other problems
kept just getting in the way.
A whole
lot about life, and death, was learned during this time and probably the one lesson
that was and still is the most challenging is “how far/hard does a loving
caregiver / family member / friend “push” or try to encourage the one with health
concerns to improve their health habits?”
Looking back, this is of course easy now – as your seeing
everything 20/20, the mother-in-law had congestive heart / renal failure and
was 90 years old and not too much realistically could be done to improve her
condition. Yet we saw her a few months before enjoying her birthday cake,
playing with her grandchildren on her lap, conversing / playing cards with
everyone and then a "just short few months later", she was tired all the time,
strenuous for her to just walk around the house and steadily losing weight (and
truthfully, interest in life). After a short hospital stay that seemed to
improve her condition a bit we tried to get her to eat more to put on some needed
weight, drink more water, tried having a physical therapist come to the house
to build up her strength. . . but it seemed everything we were doing made her
more upset. Despite all our efforts and medical miracles, she passed away
within two weeks of that last hospital stay due to a combination of
complications she had – in other words, old age.
My
wife’s cousin’s spouse’s mother passed, she was 92 years old, diabetic, had
numerous health issues and complained over the last several months about
stomach pains. They gave her meds that were to help soothe the stomach that
they thought might be a side effect of some other meds she was taking but they
didn’t help. Finally, an MRI scan showed she had cancer terminally throughout,
prognosis was 2 to 3 months but she lived, with hospice care also being
provided, only 12 days after she was informed of her condition. She loved
“Three Musketeers” candy bars, homemade cakes and pies but being diabetic she
“wasn’t allowed (as long as she didn’t get herself caught that is!)” to enjoy
them, even to the end - again, seeing everything 20/20 now!
My
wife’s close friend’s husband (age 87 energetic years old) was kinda not as
easy of a decision to make but seeing 20/20 now it kinda looks different. He walked
into the hospital for a 5-way heart bypass (didn’t even know they could even do
that many bypasses!) and came out of the operation just fine, except he had a
hard time breathing on his own. This condition was supposed to improve but
finally after over two months of no breathing improvements but a worsening
physical condition from being bed-ridden so long, the decision (his living will
request) was made to “pull the plug” with his family in bedside attendance.
Tough call as “we” always hold out for every possible hope for the one we love.
My best
friend (in his 60’s) made out the best of the bunch. He went in to the hospital
one morning for a scheduled hernia operation, complained about chest pains and
was diagnosed as having a heart attack. Long story short, a week after being
admitted he had a quad heart by-pass and after a couple weeks of rehab is on
his way back to recovery. Amen and praise the Lord! Now the tougher part, he is
pure Polish heritage, just like me, and the traditional foods we love, well,
it’s not the best for a person with heart and/or high blood pressure (that’s
me) conditions. Stuffed cabbage, kielbasa w/ sauerkraut, borsch. . . is it
really “living” without these delicacies? Not being able to make the deer
season opener this year was enough of a heartbreaker!!! The fine line between
lifestyle and health gets a little grayer, even though logic (loving caregivers
/ family / friends too) dictates this “reckless” way of life has to stop.
Then
the line gets blurrier still!!! What about the “healthy” smoker, knows they
should quit but it’s been a standard part of their lifestyle for a major part
of their life and. . .
Or the person who slowly steadily,
since early childhood, increased their weight over the years to the point now that
it is or could very well soon to be affect their health / mobility. . .
What about couch potatoes that just
love to play (“addicted to!”) video games or sit around and watch TV?
Hmmm - lifestyle or health – who
makes the choices, who ultimately chooses and sometimes it’s who ultimately “pays”
(time / effort / dollars / stressful decisions) too? Lifelong learned / adopted habits are sometimes
“loved” by now, integrated parts of the standard of life and are very hard to mentally
and physically break!
I guess looking at / thinking about
these examples and millions more, it seems the quality of lifestyle can have a
major impact on our present / future health – “duh” – common sense! Caregivers / family /
friends do all they can to help and support getting their loved one healthy again
but where does this “concern” really have to start? Well, where does learning
our lifestyle start? Doesn’t it really start at home as a child in the examples
the family/caregivers set, the “health” lessons that are taught by family or
through schooling, the friends that are kept, places travelled. . .? This is where they
get their SOL (Standard Operating Lifestyle)!
Logic dictates what lifestyle
changes we should be making for ourselves – yea yea, I need to lose some more weight,
exercise more (actually have to start again – uggh), and watch out for that Polish
food – uggggggh – and I know it is not easy to do. I have to thank the Lord I never
started to smoke! What has made/is making these changes significantly easier for
me is realizing I am establishing the SOL for my children, family, friends and
improving my own health in the process – a double bonus!!!
There will be other stressful /
confusing “life” decisions I know I will have to make for / with others, that’s
just a part of life itself. But I know I will have a comforting feeling deep
inside myself that concerning myself, I helped create, from the start, a healthier
SOL, not so much for myself but for the one’s I love. BTW, I have my “Living
will” and “final arrangements” documented too.
This past Halloween the family went
to the TurtleBee Farm Harvest Party rather than the traditional trick or
treating the neighborhood. We ate relatively healthy food that we all brought
to share (chili cook –off too – high in fiber!), chatted and sang songs around
the campfire, went on hay rides, played games including soccer (Kids got plenty
of exercise as did I but I was a little sore the next day =];-/ ),
learned about bee keeping and topped it off with a home-made pie tasting
contest! OK, the pie contest maybe wasn’t the healthiest part but it was done
in moderation and I believe it was a better compromise – lifestyle versus
health - than eating those bags full of candy!
How about you? Ready to get on
board a healthier SOL train?
BTW, Just recently my wife and I
saw the movie: “Courageous” and if you haven’t seen it yet, we highly recommend
it. Fathers (police officers mostly) taking, no, committing to responsibility,
real responsibility to properly raising their sons / children. Plenty of great
lessons on how much impact you / a parent can have on a child’s life! Bring
Kleenex! =============================================================== http://goo.gl/vKTRX - A Fine Line Between Quality of Life (Lifestyle Standard) and Quality of Health?! |
posted Sep 10, 2011, 5:11 PM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
[
updated Sep 15, 2011, 1:31 PM
]
Long long ago a local town or tribe, the local doctor or Shaman
. . . knew who their patients / people were and they were the only source for
medical attention – really no need to keep medical records because it was
stored in their memory!
Later, with more people needing to be cared for, it lead to
less personalization and “paper” needed to be kept on each patient just to “keep
the record straight”.
Today it’s more and more people being cared for by fewer
doctors but in some cases, attended to by multiple referred-to specialists that
may be working out of multiple hospitals and paper records just can’t seem to
keep up with the need for collaborative medical information.
Technology now allows us the opportunity to digitally record
ALL this medical information / opinions and store it either on-line or a backed-up
practice office server or a memory stick / device or all / any combination or
bits and pieces in multiple locations as with different doctors, specialists,
hospitals. . . that are using different EMRs.
Now let’s complicate this situation even further! With these
records now being in digital format it makes telemedicine consulting feasible
with expert specialists virtually anywhere around the world. This global
medical consulting “out-reach” can then actually fuel medical tourism which can
potentially spread a patient’s medical treatment/records out even further!
As a side note, I am not even going to touch on the data
security controversy that surrounds all this medical data that is potentially out
there and how it could be used or misused! That could be a whole other blog or
even series of books!
OK, so now we have all this medical data out there but how do we
address all these multiple portals / storage devices / locations (maybe paper
still). . .in a way there is an easy quick process to find the “pertinent”
medical information for a situation or emergency at hand?
When I was employed for a large automotive OEM, a
project I was the lead on was how to manage most of the corporation's digital
assets, from pictures/images to video presos to documents / PowerPoint decks. .
., so that they could be mined for the pertinent information and re-used /
re-purposed by properly authorized individuals.
This project took many years to just get off the
ground, there was a need for a centralized "metadata - pointers"
database but beside the shear logistics, all groups did not want to give up
control / info even if that was to their benefit. Note here, the corporation
finally settled on three Digital Asset Management (DAM) products to use with
"discussions" about settling on to one, that was before I retired a
couple years back. The company has since been purchased by another company and
I have lost track of the project's progress or lack of.
I unfortunately see EMRs / patient portals. . .
following a similar path and the in-fighting, sorry, I meant -
"political/economic resistance" may actually prevent it from
happening in my lifetime BUT I hope and pray I am wrong.
My mother-in-law had a Primary Care Physician
(PCP), several specialists and three hospitals (one hospital is still with
paper records without an EMR in the works to any of the workers knowledge) and,
currently, just record gathering was a nightmare!
In a perfect world, all a patient’s medical records, or at
least the metadata pointers, would be in one database location and this
information could be searchable to drill down to only the important pertinent
data relating to the situation at hand (provided that accessing person had
permission to access all those records too – HIPPA issues here for sure).
In a semi-perfect world there would at least be a single sign-on
portal that would link all a patient’s portals / stored records in one website
so a properly authorized person could access those records and be able to
search out meaningful / pertinent medical information for the situation at
hand.
Fortunately, or unfortunately, for today we can create our
own Personal Health Records (PHRs) that we can place the digital and/or scanned
information into, either online or on a personal storage device (or both). It
can contain the information that could save your life in an emergency but the
main drawback is, IT CAN BE A LOT OF WORK to assemble!!! Then how does one
prioritize and organize the data so the most important / pertinent data shows
up easily / quickly “first” and all the rest of the “supporting data” is still
in there but doesn’t clutter up that important “first” stuff?
So let me pose these questions to all of you that have read
down to this point thus far:
- What do you feel would be “all” the important data /
information, medical or otherwise, that one should have on a PHR card or
online PHR database?
- Where do you feel, and are comfortable with, that this
data should stored? Memory card / stick? CDs? On-line PHR service or
portal? Papers in a folder / binder? Any or all of the combinations above?
- What do you believe should be the “first read – most important”
information that should be on a PHR card or online database?
- Should some of the files be password protected while
others should not (What if you are unable to relay or put-in a P/W during
an emergency)? If yes to P/W some, what files should be protected and
which should not?
- What ideas/thoughts do you have for your medical records
access policy? IE: any doctor / nurse / medical professional. . . can
access all of them? Only my PCP and maybe specialists that I have a HIPPA
agreement on file with (but what if you were traveling?)? Or???
- How old should the records
go back to or should all / some of the records go “all the way back” and
what should the criteria/reasons be for that record retention policy?
- What file formats do you feel these files should be
stored as?
- What’s your thoughts on those proprietary x-rays, CT
scans, MRIs. . . files/viewers that come loaded on the CDs you can received
as part of your “requested” medical records?
- Should all these files be searchable? If yes, through
what means / product(s)?
- Any other thoughts or ideas you have that would make a
PHR (YOUR PHR) more
useful in case of an emergency or even for a “new patient” doctor visit?
Please contact me (PEndrasik@GreenSmartLLC.com) sharing your
answers, thoughts, opinions, further questions and ideas concerning this blog
and it’s open questions. Thank you in advance for your participation.
In
the meantime, I/we at Green Smart Consulting LLC will work with folks to help
pull their PHRs together in some logical sequence of importance because
"when seconds count – important information cannot afford to be found minutes
away".
From Not Having the Information THEN Too Much Information? - http://goo.gl/VOKT9 |
posted Sep 1, 2011, 6:15 AM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
[
updated Sep 13, 2011, 4:31 AM
]
It was a tough “weekend plus” to say the least!!!
Katie – She was my wife’s (and her brother’s) 90 year old wonderful
mom, my father-in-law’s beloved wife of 64+ years, my sweet mother-in-law, brother's wife too, “loved
tooo much” grandmother of our two 7 year old children/ wife’s brother’s two
girls, beloved relative and dear friend of so many many more, passed away from
old age in her home on Friday August 26th, 2011 with family at her
bedside.
She is at peace with the Lord but that’s when the hell-on-earth
started for the loved one’s left behind!
After the initial shock ended, reality set in and next steps needed
to be taken, it was who do you call now or what do you do? It started with a
call to the funeral home who informed us they needed a number from the medical
examiner before they could come to pick her up – call the police - 911.
Police were called but paramedics, lights flashing and all
(uncalled for we felt), were required to arrive first to connect the EKG. . .
to confirm death. They were met after a few minutes by police and the officer received
the paramedic’s report, but still had to check the body for “foul play”, placed an emergency call to the family's PCP to see if she would sign the death certificate (otherwise
the county medical examiner would have to become physically involved). The PCP
called back, thankfully rather promptly, agreeing to sign the certificate so a (police)
call to the medical examiner produced the number to provide the funeral home.
Note: if she were in the hospital or being attended to by hospice, much of this
police work would not have been necessary. The officer then waited at the house
to verify we were calling the funeral home to arrange pick up.
The pick-up was done by two well dressed men who closed the
bedroom door to discreetly placed mom’s body in the body bag / on the gurney –
this was a considerate action. She was taken away in a minivan with no
commercial markings and this was appreciated as well.
THEN, there was the pressure to come down to the funeral
home to make the gut-wrenching final arrangements! “Come down tonight (few hours after her death) if possible or first thing tomorrow morning!!!” We felt, AKA: need to decide quickly while the
emotional quotient is at it’s peak! The family opted for the next day and then,
next morning, it was two plus hours of picking out the casket/ vault (from
plain, which they didn’t have on display, to waterproof / virtually
gold-plated). . . Smooth comforting talk while the dollars add up and up and
you show respect for your loved one!!! Hmmm, maybe it’s just me but personalizing
the vault who no one sees except the grave digger? Additionally surprising,
somewhat even above most of the rest, a deceased’s noble gesture of “donating
tissue” is an additional ($250) charge tacked on to the embalming fees (was not
applied in this case but I did notice on the extensive price sheet!)! So be
aware, if there is a thought / idea of it, there seems to be a standard charge
for it. The funeral arrangements (choices) made this time could be considered
average for a “traditional” church funeral.
The cemetery BTW required the gravesite “opening / closing”
fee by cash or check ($1200+) by the day of the funeral – guess they were
scared they might go in the hole – lol!
Flowers need to be chosen too, might as well get it done
before stopping for some needed, but not really desired, nutrition.
OK, worst part over, only two more arrangements before going
back to the house to gather pictures / memorial items for the upcoming visitation.
Off to the church to schedule, arrange the mass and surprisingly there was
another hour and a half-ish for picking out songs, going over the Standard
Operating Procedures (SOP) for the funeral mass and understanding the fees
(organist. . .) and donation expectations.
Last on the list, restaurant reservations for the gathering
of friends and family after the funeral. Picked up a banquet menu from the restaurant
on the ride home (was also available on the web, if desired/needed) and after
making a relatively easy decision, a simple phone call completed that task.
That was the most painless / almost least expensive of the arrangements!
The rest of the evening and part of the next day was spent
on trying to relax a bit, going through old photo albums, reminiscing and creating
the photo memory boards for the funeral home viewing.
The following couple days, a day of visitation/rosary and
the funeral, were an indescribable emotional roller coaster followed with
mental / physical exhaustion and restless sleep. Sadness, brought on by so many
memories that rudely jolt us into the reality that this is the end of making more
memories with this person that so dearly touched our lives.
We know there will be more of the tough moments ahead, choosing
/ buying the memorial stone, spending the times alone, the holiday gatherings,
the paying off the funeral bills that are currently tipping a tad over $15K
(yep that’s $15,000.00+ in a few days time) - but that’s life (and death)!
The parents were/are really well prepared for this final
episode in life considering all that was described above. They already had
their cemetery burial plots chosen and paid for (note; this cost not included above),
they have their “legal papers/ wishes” documented, the funeral home / church were/are
pre-chosen, their obituaries were/are written (with appropriate blanks left
open), clothing/ jewelry set aside, contact list made and their photo albums. .
. are well organized.
So what does this all have to do with health and healthcare
outside of the obvious emotional / physical strain that is enough to put some into cardiac arrest or an emotional/mental breakdown?
It’s about advance preparation of records / arrangements (not
necessarily pre-pay but pre-arrange) before the event happens.
My Green Smart LLC team and I have been strong advocates of
creating / maintaining Personal Health Records (PHRs) where your medical data
is in one or two places, either on-line and/or a memory stick / card you carry
with you, so when the emergency/medical situation/s happen there is the best,
most complete medical data available to efficiently and accurately address /
assist your situation – regardless of where you are or what you were doing
before that time.
After this past experience, I’m believing final wishes /
arrangements (funeral. . .) need to be part of an “enhanced” PHR record as
well, especially if you are an organ. . . donor.
I now know for myself that there are further details in this
area that I need to address ASAP and I, personally, do not want to be one that brings
great financial / unnecessary “emotional decision-making” burden on those I
love and will be leaving behind – Grief is tough enough! My wishes won’t be “guessed
about or made under peak emotional pressure” as they will be pre-arranged for a
“natural burial - http://www.michigannaturalburial.com/
” first take what organs. . . are useful, place the rest in a cardboard box and bury me directly in a field w/o
embalming or viewing. In lieu of flowers, please plant a tree in my memory! My final request will be to take some of the extra
insurance money that there should be left and throw an open bar party reminiscing our good times we had together – my fill-in-the-blanks obituary, contact list and photo slide show will
be on my PHR memory card! A toast! - Then I’ll see you someday on the other
side!
One final point I feel I need to make clear and that is I
really don’t carry any grudges, chips-on-my-shoulder or vendettas against
funeral directors, cemeteries or related services / professions having been
part of this experience. These are legitimate professions performing a needed
service and they need to make a living like everyone else! I can only say it’s not
a profession / philosophy I could feel the least bit comfortable doing! The biggest
point / advice I am trying to make here is to be prepared before the emergency
/ rush happens, whether it is with creating your “enhanced” PHR / EMR connection,
compiling a emergency plan/kit or any other
situations where irrational / emotional decisions could unnecessarily be required
to be made in haste.
Rest in peace Katie, you will always be in our hearts!
Poly A. Endrasik Jr.
Please feel free to email me if you wish to discuss PHRs or.
. . further.
PEndrasik@GreenSmartLLC.com Update as of 9/11/2011: Visited the father-in-law this past weekend and he brought up will, Power of Attorney (PoA). . . what is a Trust / what are it's benefits and it appears there may be further research, discussions and preparations there too for both him and myself / family. Have to have those documents done and somehow recorded (scanned /map storage location/s) somewhere on the PHR (maybe some info only saved on the "home" PHR stick but the Medical PoA info for sure on the wallet / mobile card!)
Funeral Arrangements – A Health Changing Experience! - http://goo.gl/WJHx8 |
posted Aug 18, 2011, 8:02 PM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
How many times have we seen workflow and work process used
almost interchangeably? Example: “When implementing an EMR, a doctor’s workflow
will have to change” – versus – “When implementing an EMR, a doctor’s work
process will have to change”. Well it seems to mean the same and if used in an
article or blog intermixed you probably wouldn’t even pay any attention to it.
So how are these two term actually defined:
Wikipedia defines workflow as: “A workflow consists of a sequence of
connected steps. It is a depiction of a sequence of operations, declared
as work of a person, a group of persons, an organization of staff, or one or
more simple or complex mechanisms. Workflow may be seen as any abstraction
of real work, segregated in workshare, work split or other types of ordering.”
Wikipedia defines process (work process is not defined) as: “Process or processing typically describes
the act of taking something through an established and usually routine set
of procedures to convert it from one form to another, as a manufacturing or
administrative procedure, such as processing milk into cheese, or
processing paperwork
to grant a mortgage loan.”
When you read the
definitions they “kinda” look the same but I see a very significant
distinction. A distinction that I see is important when assessing a medical
practice for EMR implementation.
One key EMR
implementation complaint that has been expressed by doctors is the “workflow” has to change, sometime
drastically to be successful with the EMR deployment. I agree process change
occurs when an EMR is implemented but I believe the workflow should not have to
unless it is viewed beneficial by everyone. I profess the work processes, which
I see are subsets to the workflow, will definitely change!
A doctor will
still see a scheduled patient, refer back to their files, whether they are
using paper charts or electronic records, the doctor will still record the
findings via pencil or keystroke / speaking. . . this is workflow and should
not be required to change! The work process/es are what changes, paper and
pencil are replaced by a tablet PC and may use speech recognition for
documenting the visit and then move electronically into e-prescribing, billing,
patient portal / PHR.
The key point
that needs to be made here is the doctor has a great responsibility in
providing the best treatment / care for their patients and should not be
required to change their workflow if it works best for their environment but
change only their work process/es to take advantage of electronic medical
records.
Well, you may be
saying, “hmmm, that makes common sense and is no big deal” but let me
illustrate through one example we discovered during the physician interviews we
conducted over the past year and a half. After several months of using a
prominent EMR product, one doctor revealed to us that they were still using
their paper charts to record information on the patient visit and during after-hours
or during lunch or breaks entering the data into the EMR. WHY!!!! Several
reasons were given, among them were the network was too slow (BTW: laptop was “verified
as very fast!”) to keep up with the pace of the doctors, they didn’t have their
old records scanned into the EMR yet so it was easier to just use the old
system, typing took too much doctor face time away from patient, too many
screens were required to re-enter the same data and it was difficult viewing
on-line lab reports with the patient on the laptop much less having a printed
copy to give to the patient on request.
So what happened
here?
Process changes
forced a change in workflow by adding to it. The added processes being EMR
records being updated after the patient had left the appointment and the “new”
data being taken off paper records which feeds another continued, unneeded
process of continued maintenance / access of the paper records. This workflow
did not have to change if the network was adequately capable or preloading of
scheduled patient records were done locally and the short-term required
strategic scanning strategy, possibly using outsourced resources, was implemented.
Another key
“quality healthcare” workflow change (some would argue it is a process) is the
reduced ratio of personal focused “face time” attention to the patient. The new
process of “typing / computer engagement” now bides for the patient’s time and
could justifiably provide a reason for the doctor to not give up the paper! Proper
user-friendly templates and/or typing training and/or speech recognition could
provide a good solution here.
If an EMR
requires the same data to be added to different screens thereby adding cumbersome
workflow steps and it cannot be reprogrammed otherwise then the fault lies with
choosing the product that is not a fit for your practice. Sorry about that!
Research, research, research and asking questions of friend / colleagues. . .
versus just EMR salespeople, could have helped here.
Having done a
proper infrastructure (hardware, software, peripheral. . .) assessment and
training, as would have been done as part of professional managed project, would
/ could eliminate the difficulty of sharing electronic data with the patient.
Everything patient
related could / should be done before the patient leaves the examination room
and that’s the way workflow was done in the “old days” or less!
This touched the
tip of an iceberg, there are more examples but the underlying premise is the
work processes will definitely change but the workflow may not need to or will
naturally change for the better. The amount of research, whether you do it
yourself or use consultants, and the project management strategy you use or
hire in will ultimately determine how successful your EMR process change-over
will be. |
posted Aug 10, 2011, 4:17 AM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
Wow, what a life awakening experience!
This past year after falling from a
ladder I had the experience of being taken to an ER at a large local hospital,
admitted and then being transferred to another larger hospital’s neurological
ICU section. Being involved on HIT (my company assists small practices with
implementing minimally invasive IT, EMRs and business related products /
process solutions) it turned out to be quite an education but because of the “health
circumstances” I had it is a lesson I would never want to learn / experience
again.
So in a
nutshell what happened is I was on a ladder about 7’ up, apparently fell (I
actually to this day do not remember anything beyond being up on the ladder) and
my wife, out of the corner of her eye, saw me fall. She dragged me into the
house, onto the couch where I remained out for about 5 minutes and then we
proceeded to our local large hospital ER where I walked in to get checked out.
A CT scan showed I had a small bleed on the brain and a decision was made to
transfer me to an even larger hospital that has a dedicated neurological ICU
floor. The HIT person inside me asked if they were electronically transferring
my EMR records / scan to the other hospital’s EMR system and they then stated
they would fax the report there because their EMRs were incompatible.
Figures!!! I later found out the first hospital was using C*****, the other one
was using E*** and that also turned out to be a reason for a whole lot of duplicate
questions being asked of me by countless numbers of healthcare pros- uggh, my
head hurts!
Ambulance arrived to take me to
the next hospital and during the directions that my wife was writing down on
how best to get to there a question arose of how I got to this first hospital,
to which she informed them “I drove him here”. I/she was surprised to hear a “non-
appreciated” response of “you shouldn’t do that, that’s our job” – hmmm –
somehow we missed reading that “rule”! Then the rest of the transport was
uneventful.
Arriving
at the next hospital was met with scores of healthcare pros asking tons of
questions, many repetitive from the other hospital, then scheduled for another
CT scan before being taken to a room on their ICU floor. Finally a chance to
get some sleep, my sweet wife slept in the chair next to me all night while a
caring neighbor watched our children, but bright and early the morning were
more health care pros, doctors, med students, new nurses coming on shift, blood
drawers, deliverer of meds. . . asking more information or providing
information of which I believe I remember hardly a 1/5th. I do know
there was a fair amount of questions asked concerning pre-existing conditions I
had, meds / supplements I was taking and any / all drug allergies. When I
finally did “wake up” (sorry, no coffee or food yet till they determined I
didn’t need surgery – that came 2 days later) I asked my very kind ICU nurse:
“Just what information would you say is critical for doctors to have when a
person is admitted to ER, especially if unresponsive?”. She kindly gave me a
short list which I committed to memory and promised myself to make it the
“initial” part of my ICE (In Case of Emergency) PHR (Personal Health Record)
wallet card / I-Phone too in case this ever happened again. Then my only concern
will be is the health care facility going to be able to review it first and
save me a ton of repetitive ER/ICU questions.
After 2
full days in ICUs, another (3rd) CT scan the second day that shown
no further bleeding, I was released to a room in the general section, my first
hospital breakfast and COFFEE. I again was visited from early morning on by
more doctors, med students, nurses of various types, blood drawers (which none
could tell me any test results of previous draws – hmmm?) and nutrition support
(brought the food trays).
I guess
I realize that all these health professionals have vital parts to play in
patient care and I am truthfully not knocking them for that but as finally
(hopefully not again) being a patient I really don’t know who I can call as my
primary care doctor for this condition/stay that I can call or e-mail to answer
any follow-up questions I may have. The head RNs were great and could check
into the hospitals EMR information and print out some reports / answer basic
questions (God love them – they were His / my angels) but they couldn’t answer
“reason for certain medication” questions or “discuss CT scan results written
in DReze”. . . I did have the name of a
doctor written on my board in my room but honestly I don’t remember actually
meeting / talking with her – there were just so many professionals coming all
times of day and night. I did have a Dr that I needed to follow-up with the
following week (different than the name on the “board”) that I can’t remember
meeting in the hospital. I had a neuro-medication prescribed by yet another
person, not the filling pharmacist either, that was meant to prevent seizures that
states under “Uses: . . . It is not known how it works to prevent seizures.”
and I wanted to ask the doctor about that and why it is prescribed to me. This
med also caused me drowsiness, dizziness and weakness (known / documented side
effects) but my discharge instructions state to contact my personal primary
care physician with questions if these side effects occur. My personal primary
care physician (PCP) typically doesn’t specialize in this area, is not really
familiar with this med and why it was prescribed so who do I call, the pharmacist,
the person that prescribed it, the person who’s name was on the board or the
doctor who discharged me (yes, this was yet another doctor) or my RN or ????
I know
it is probably hoping for too much but wouldn’t it be nice (accountable) if
when you were admitted to the hospital you were assign one (“1”) primary care doctor
with maybe a resident / intern collaborator / back-up that would co-sign-off
reviewing your scans, labs. . . and then during pseudo-regular daily scheduled
rounds (so “the family” can be present if it warrants) these scans, labs. . .
can be reviewed, with you, family and this 2 person doctor / team, on the
computers that already are present in the rooms or maybe even projected on the
patient’s room TV? Additionally wouldn’t it be nice (efficient) if this primary
doc/ intern / resident team be the ones that ingest your ICE PHR information into
their EMR, explain the meds, review diet recommendations (and why do you always
seem to get overcooked veggies with hospital meals? – but maybe that’s just another
future blog topic!), review with you / sign-off your discharge instructions, be
the one/s you have follow-up appointments with, help coordinate the paperwork
necessary to insure you have all the EMR e-records that are essential for you
to have included in your Personal Health Record (PHR) as you leave the hospital,
make sure you have their business cards, with contact info, to be able to e-mail
them with follow-up questions and be the primary contact/s for your personal primary
care physician to me able to collaborate with for your on-going care / treatment
plan? Hmmm, must have been hit on the head to think that might someday come
true. BTW, come to think of it, why doesn’t your personal PCP make hospital
visits any longer? Hmmm, that must have gone the way of “house calls” too!
As it
stands today, is it truly possible too many docs. . . will spoil the patient
care broth? |
posted Jan 13, 2011, 6:09 AM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
[
updated Jan 13, 2011, 6:28 AM
]
In 2000, a movie came out called “The Perfect Storm”, wow - almost 11 years ago now and still remembering it well! This was a sea-faring disaster film starring George Clooney, Mark Wahlberg and Diane Lane. In summary a small commercial 40-foot fishing boat, with Captain “George Clooney”, heads out of port one more time to prove they still have what it takes to bring in a respectable load of fish and make the money they need to live on. They venture out to some new waters and catch a boat load of fish but their ice machine fails so rather than wait out rough weather they decide to head back to port, through it, so the catch/cargo doesn’t spoil. To add to it all, on the way back they lose radio contact which was kinda predictable.
The weatherman was tracking the confluence of two major storm fronts and a hurricane at which point he states, excitedly, it will create “the perfect storm” . You can probably guess that the fishing boat ended up in the middle of this massive storm and was last seen trying to ride over an enormous 100ft+ wave. Sadly but expectedly the boat overturns with boat and crew being lost. The movie ends with a memorial service for those that went out to sea but never returned.
So what the heck does this have to do with telemedicine today? From my observations, research and tracking there is a perfect storm brewing but rather than being negative, it could build into an enormous wave of opportunity for the advancement of healthcare.
Besides the already existing sea of opportunity in telemed consultations being held from a local or remote practice / clinic / hospital / emergency in-field laptop to a specialist(s) or specialty hospital(s) virtually anywhere around the world there will soon be an expanded prescribed at-home and mobile patient monitoring / consultation / treatment planning opportunity.
So what are these storm fronts / pressure cells that will create this massive opportunity wave?
Let’s list some:
- Because of U.S. government legislation / incentives that push the conversion of paper medical records to digital, aka EMRs, which therefore provide ready access to / video display of electronic health records / information (HD digital x-rays. . . ).
- Registration opened on January 3, 2011 for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs.
- Up to $44,000 in incentives available for non-hospital doctors / practices.
- Penalties!!! Medicare payment reductions if doctors haven't achieved "meaningful use" of an EMR by 2015.
- As CMS transitions from a fee-for-service to a health quality business model, doctors will feel the need to improve productivity in which telemed could offer opportunities.
- Because of U.S. government legislation that pushes doctors to adopting EMRs many doctors are or will be retiring or leaving the profession causing a shortage of healthcare professionals to provide care for a growing “insured” and an older American population. “Surviving” doctors will have to find newer efficient methods to provide quality care to more.
- September 30th, 2010 “(Reuters) - The U.S. healthcare reform law will worsen a shortage of physicians as millions of newly insured patients seek care, the Association of American Medical Colleges said on Thursday.
The group's Center for Workforce Studies released new estimates that showed shortages would be 50 percent worse in 2015 than forecast.
"While previous projections showed a baseline shortage of 39,600 doctors in 2015, current estimates bring that number closer to 63,000, with a worsening of shortages through 2025," the group said in a statement.
"The United States already was struggling with a critical physician shortage and the problem will only be exacerbated as 32 million Americans acquire health care coverage, and an additional 36 million people enter Medicare."”
- The teleconferencing technologies advancements providing better resolution over slower "dirtier" general purpose internet or wireless networks.
- Utilizing the newest ITU H.264 SVC standard: “May 12, 2010 – Vidyo®, Inc., the first company to deliver personal telepresence, today introduced VidyoHealth™, an affordable scalable telemedicine videoconferencing suite that leverages the Internet and other general purpose IP networks, for a broad range of applications such as telepsychiatry, home-health and eldercare, speech therapy, and specialist consultations. . .”
- December 2010, Skype unveiled a video-calling application for Apple Inc.'s iPhone
- Federal funds becoming available for improving broadband telehealth networks.
- March 2010, a prime example, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) allocated $145M to telehealth projects providing high speed network linking hundreds of hospitals in 17 states. This is an expansion of FCC’s Rural Health Care Pilot Program, started in 2007.
- The hurricane of mobile devices / medical apps / plug-and-play medical devices.
- December 2010, CTIA (The Wireless Association, Nielsen Co., International Telecommunications Union) data: 93% Americans have cellphones / wireless, 29.7% are smartphones and 90% of the global population has access to mobile networks.
- September 2010, articles published revealing 3 million doctors had already downloaded a 59p app that converts an iPhone into a stethoscope.
- December 2010, Mobisante, an mHealth company, revealed a prototype of an ultrasound probe / peripheral connected to a smartphone and is seeking FDA approval.
- Way too many more examples to mention but additional resources are listed at: http://goo.gl/ZEkBh
- The acceptance by consumers of to-the-home high speed networks, high definition TV / theater systems, mobile devices and V/C technologies. Technology acceptance also as “employees” in their corporate environments.
- October 2010, Cisco Umi was rolled out as its consumer telepresence offering.
- Again, December 2010, Skype unveiled a video-calling application for Apple Inc.'s iPhone, this can connect to Skype running on your home computer / laptop.
- Vidyo, Polycom, Tandberg, Oovoo, Lifesize, Webex, Google Video, and I’m sure I missed a few hundred more.
Only a small sampling of excerpts of related newsworthy articles were presented here, to try to present all or most would just be impossible and probably boring. As you can see by what was presented and the dates of publishing, the storm fronts are developing, intensifying and converging. Technology, hardware, software, infrastructure (networks), necessity for healthcare professionals to become more efficient/improve quality and consumer accepting technology are creating an enormous wave of exciting opportunities, limited only by money and the imagination, for the consumer/patient, healthcare professional and technology services/products provider. The disaster will ultimately be for those who ignore or try to hold back the perfect storm (there still remains some issues of some insurers not paying for telemed services but that is currently under active discussion / negotiations / lobbying).
If there are opportunities you would like to explore with me / Green Smart Consulting LLC, please don’t hesitate to contact me at pendrasik@GreenSmartLLC.com.
To learn more about telemedicine the American Telemedicine Association (ATA), http://www.americantelemed.org/ , is the leading resource and advocate promoting access to medical care for consumers and health professionals via telecommunications technology. |
posted Aug 22, 2010, 12:01 AM by Poly A Endrasik Jr
[
updated Aug 22, 2010, 12:05 AM
]
Recently I read and tweeted this article: “GrnSmart_Health http://bit.ly/9kJCgd - UT ophthalmologist develops program to automate the analysis of potential eye problems” and it got me thinking what medicine will be like in 50 years. What IF this huge database of upcoming patient information is data mined and research technology is applied like in the article.
Early in my career I started working on cars, granted they were simpler back then (carburetors et al), but as a mechanic I was kinda like a doctor. If these problems / conditions existed or were expressed then based on my knowledge, shop manuals, other mechanic’s consultations then a series of tests would be run to diagnose the cause and fix the problem. I know at times it seemed like just a guessing game but in the end it really was about “if” and “then” analysis based on past data. Although I don’t work much on cars now I know they have systems where they plug the testing instruments into the vehicle’s diagnostic connector, the diagnostic computer analyses the inputs and through it’s internal “if / then database” reports fault codes for the mechanic to address.
Within 50 years will this new “standardized” database of health information complete with digital x-rays, high definition imagery, digital lab reports. . . be combined with centuries of medical knowledge to produce an in-home “Dr ADAPT (Automated Diagnosis And Patient Treatment)” room? Will you simply stand on a platform or sit in a chair (they already have a chair to develop from, for telemedicine: http://www.commwellmedical.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17&Itemid=21) and the diagnostic computer analyzes the inputs then creates a custom treatment / e-prescription plan / regime for the day, week or month? Then will your EMR information be automatically uploaded to the central research database where the central computer system continually refines standardized medical treatments based on these additional “ifs / thens”?
Hmmm, makes me wonder what medicine might be like in 2110? Will implanted devices automatically keep you disease / illness free? If manual intervention be required will it be done with absolute precision by automated robots? Will there be a need for doctors or simply researchers?
OK, it’s time to return to reality, call / schedule my appointment with my doctor to get my scripts renewed, add my new organic supplements that I read about and am taking to my PHR stick and pay some doctor / dentist bills.
Come to think about it, if dental health has been shown to significantly contribute to a person’s health, shouldn’t they be part of this EMR. . . initiative? Shouldn’t I add those records to my PHR stick? Will the docs / hospitals use this data or know how to? What about chiropractic data? Guess I will have to save these topics for a future blog. |
|